|
|
|
Forum Member
 
Group: Forum Members
Last Login: Yesterday @ 22:54:55
Posts: 31,
Visits: 135
|
|
My Bad, I didn't make myself clear
I was actually thinking of a situation where a front rower gets injured and the side decides to or has to go non contested and wants to replace the front rower with an earlier substituted back rower
So in effect the team are saying there is not a suitably trained player to take the guy's place so instead of putting on another hooker who can't prop (and call non contested) we're going to put our backrower on that we earlier replaced - and call non contested with a plyer who is far more use around the park
Cheers
Angus
|
|
|
|